Soliciting data from the community
It's official. We shilly-shallied about it for months, but now we have finally settled on Rivals of Aether as our training platform. On November 25th, I made a thread on r/RivalsOfAether titled Looking for replay files to use in machine learning research. I honestly was not sure what kind of response to expect. I had only learned about RoA's existence, I would estimate, sometime around mid-October. Rei pitched it to me several times as a viable alternative to Doom and Quake for machine learning, citing its ability to record input data from matches in plaintext. They even bought me a copy towards the end of October, which featured in my blog post about setting up SerpentAI.The plaintext replay files are certainly an attractive prospect when compared to the binary demo files found in id shooters. Furthermore, the game itself is stylish and fun. I mean, just look at Orcane!
Source |
Well, in less than 24 hours after I posted on the RoA subreddit, the community gave us 893 replay files featuring matches from a variety of settings, including tournaments, exhibitions, and ranked matches. This dataset makes a world of difference, not just to the practicality of our project but also to my outlook. In retrospect, I have come to realize that I simply like Rivals more than Quake/Doom; I just needed to know that it could be a viable platform before I could let myself get attached to it.
As of today (11/27), we have 1,032 replays. I honestly couldn't be happier. I just want to do a good job so that we can make the Rivals community proud.
Regarding feedback on the design document
We received feedback on our design document draft. Apart from fixing our citations and, you know, actually compiling our LaTeX into PDF, we mainly need to improve our literature and methodology write-ups. I already have a two-birds-one-stone styled plan for this.We will do another pass over all of our academic sources, filling out templates I designed to guide us for both of the aforementioned sections. The templates are meant to serve as an organized repository of information—kind of like a document database, except not elegant or efficient, but rather all crammed inside of a single WYSIWYG doc. I guess I will share that template here, but please be kind when you tear it to shreds:
Article title
Researcher names
Problem:
What they are using machine learning to do.
Application/Tests:
What game or environment they are placing their AI into and what concrete tasks they give it.
Software:
List of libraries, software, and other tools used by the researchers.
Data Structures & Algorithms:
List of data structures and algorithms they use, and a brief description for each.
Data flow:
Quick explanation of how the aforementioned data structures and algorithms work together to produce the desired result, i.e. a textual data flow summary.
Outcome:
Whether or not the tests were successful.
References:
Any research or experiments that are frequently mentioned. Note the title, research and context as follows: Title. Names. Context.
We should have approached our research in this neat and organized manner from the start. Oh well. We will just have to find time to reread everything. We will also have to find time to research the same problems we have already researched but for 2D. Also, we will need to properly assess Keras and fix our introduction section. Of course, it's easy to just list the things we have to do...
Comments
Post a Comment